The Georgia Commission has met many of its goals in terms of education, recommendations to the bar and bringing sustained attention to the professionalism effort. If the goal was to create more awareness of these issues and build some sensitivity among practitioners to how they behave and how they are perceived, the Commission has succeeded. Awareness has been achieved.
In fact, awareness has been achieved to the extent that money has flowed into the professionalism effort through a consent order entered by a federal judge in settlement of a protracted discovery dispute. In late 1998, Judge Hugh Lawson's order required the defendant to pay to each of the four ABA-accredited law schools in Georgia the sum of $2.5 million to endow at each school a chair of Ethics and Professionalism in the Practice of Law. This act lent immediate credibility to this area of the curriculum. The order further required the defendant to pay $1 million to set up a fund to endow an annual Symposium on Ethics and Professionalism in the Practice of Law, to be hosted on a rotating basis by each of the law schools. Additionally, the sum of $250,000 was required by the order to be paid to the Chief Justice's Commission on Professionalism to be used to further its mission.
Fundamentally, the professionalism effort in Georgia has assisted in rebuilding the community of the bar. Scores of lawyers throughout the state have volunteered to participate as speakers, panelists, and facilitators at CLE events and the law school programs, as mentors, and as authors of published articles and columns on professionalism. Being associated with the professionalism movement in Georgia is seen as an honor. Membership on the Commission, the State Bar Committee on Professionalism, serving as a mentor, speaking on Professionalism at CLE programs are highly sought after designations.
The law schools and the judiciary and the bar in Georgia have very constructive relationships, and the professionalism effort has built on and enhanced that. A law school professor confessed: "At first, I thought all this professionalism business was just fluff; but now that I've seen the enthusiasm and heard the questions that students bring into the classroom from the Orientations on Professionalism, I'm a convert. We are being challenged in the classroom to talk about professionalism in the practice of law."
Professionalism has become a shorthand way of communicating the values of competence, civility, character, and commitment to the public good. A state trial court judge remarked, "Fifteen years ago, if I had called two lawyers into my chambers and asked them to act more professionally, it would not have meant a lot. Now, it does, because of the Commission's work." The professionalism movement has led the Georgia lawyers and judges to develop a common vocabulary, making the values of professionalism the coin of the realm for high standing in the legal community.
However, if the goal is to bring about change (both personal and systemic) it is very difficult to measure. The Commission would have more empirical data if, at the time of the creation of the Commission, a survey had been done of Georgia lawyers' and judges' attitudes about professionalism in the practice of law. This would have established a baseline for comparison. The University of Georgia School of Law undertook an empirical survey in 2002 on the frequency with which Georgia lawyers encounter various types of unprofessional conduct in discovery and their responses to it. The results of this survey will provide a basis for assessing the state of professionalism in pre-trial discovery since 2002.
Those state supreme courts and bars considering a statewide professionalism effort would be well-advised to include at the outset an empirical study of the current state of professionalism to provide a benchmark for later studies seeking to assess the effectiveness of the effort.
Although Georgia lacks scientific measurement, numerous examples can be cited of the attention drawn to professionalism among the lawyers, judges, and legal educators of Georgia. Many of these are local bar professionalism initiatives.
The response to the Georgia Professionalism effort among lawyers and judges has been positive. The organized Bar, judges at all levels, and all five law schools in Georgia are on board and supportive. Law firms are supportive. Most importantly, the everyday practicing lawyer generally has responded affirmatively. A participant at Town Hall Meeting said, "Increase the professionalism CLE requirement to two hours each year, and make one of them a meeting such as this one." A CLE participant at criminal defense seminar reported, "The program helped me to better deal with clients. Continue to do the good work." The Georgia experience shows that lawyers and judges are hungry to talk about and work on professionalism issues. The key is to give them an appropriate and carefully thought out forum for doing so. This is the function of Professionalism CLE delivered in innovative and creative formats showing the interplay of the rules of ethics and the broader and higher aspirations of professionalism. The Georgia experience shows that lawyers and judges will respond constructively if the program or project is done well and they have a sense that the activity is leading somewhere. An example is the State Bar Law Practice Management Program created in response to the concerns expressed at the Town Hall Meetings about the economics of practice. The Commission has found that its work will continue to survive only if the rank and file of Georgia lawyers perceive it as a positive contribution to the challenges of contemporary legal practice.