- Casemaker
- Directories
- Check CLE
- Public Information
- Handbook
- Member Essentials
- Programs
- Ethics
- Cornerstones of Freedom
- Communications
- Sections
- Young Lawyers Division
- Related Organizations
- Bar Meetings
- Parking Deck
- Law-Related Education
- Sponsorship/Marketing
- Vendor Directory
- Conference Center
- Storefront
RULE 1.14 CLIENT UNDER A DISABILITY
(a) When a client's ability to make adequately considered decisions in
connection with the representation is impaired, whether because of age,
mental or medical disability or for some other reason, the lawyer
shall, as far as reasonably possible, maintain a normal client-lawyer
relationship with the client.
(b) A lawyer may seek the appointment of a guardian or take other
protective action with respect to a client when the lawyer reasonably
believes that the client cannot adequately act in the client's own
interest.
The maximum penalty for a violation of this Rule is a public reprimand.
Comment
[1] The normal client-lawyer relationship is based on the assumption
that the client, when properly advised and assisted, is capable of
making decisions about important matters. When the client is a minor or
suffers from a mental disorder or disability, however, maintaining the
ordinary client-lawyer relationship may not be possible in all
respects. In particular, an incapacitated person may have no power to
make legally binding decisions. Nevertheless, a client lacking legal
competence often has the ability to understand, deliberate upon, and
reach conclusions about matters affecting the client's own well-being.
Furthermore, to an increasing extent the law recognizes intermediate
degrees of competence. For example, children as young as five or six
years of age, and certainly those of ten or twelve, are regarded as
having opinions that are entitled to weight in legal proceedings
concerning their custody. So also, it is recognized that some persons
of advanced age can be quite capable of handling routine financial
matters while needing special legal protection concerning major
transactions.
[2] The fact that a client suffers a disability does not diminish the
lawyer's obligation to treat the client with attention and respect. If
the person has no guardian or legal representative, the lawyer often
must act as de facto guardian. Even if the person does have a legal
representative, the lawyer should as far as possible accord the
represented person the status of client, particularly in maintaining
communication.
[3] If a legal representative has already been appointed for the
client, the lawyer should ordinarily look to the representative for
decisions on behalf of the client. If a legal representative has not
been appointed, the lawyer should see to such an appointment where it
would serve the client's best interests. Thus, if a disabled client has
substantial property that should be sold for the client's benefit,
effective completion of the transaction ordinarily requires appointment
of a legal representative. In many circumstances, however, appointment
of a legal representative may be expensive or traumatic for the client.
Evaluation of these considerations is a matter of professional judgment
on the lawyer's part.
[4] If the lawyer represents the guardian as distinct from the ward,
and is aware that the guardian is acting adversely to the ward's
interest, the lawyer may have an obligation to prevent or rectify the
guardian's misconduct. See Rule 1.2(d): Scope of Representation.
Disclosure of the Client's Condition
[5] Rules of procedure in litigation generally provide that minors or
persons suffering mental disability shall be represented by a guardian
or next friend if they do not have a general guardian. However,
disclosure of the client's disability can adversely affect the client's
interests. For example, raising the question of disability could, in
some circumstances, lead to proceedings for involuntary commitment. The
lawyer's position in such cases is an unavoidably difficult one. The
lawyer may seek guidance from an appropriate diagnostician.